Over the last two and a half weeks , my classmates and I embarked on a journey to Japan to experience a culture that differs from usual the American culture, and compare and contrast American and Japanese civil society. While we had prepared ourselves for this trip through prior readings devoted to civil society, our very own opinions in regards to Japanese and American civil society have been reinforced and formulated on the basis of our own experiences. Each and every member of the class has his/her own findings that address that may address the differences that classify Japanese civil society separately from its American counterpart. I have learned and witnessed many differences between the two and I thought it would be neat if I could share some of the things I have learned or seen firsthand.
I think one important aspect of this comparison to point out is the definition of civil society related terms in Japan. The term "NGO" in Japan is used exclusively to denote international aid programs whereas in the US, an NGO is denoted as a non- profit organization, known as an NPO in Japan. With that being said, there are not many large scale NGOs in Japan, despite the evidence that NGOs are growing. Unlike the United States, there is more government intervention, with the state shutting down organizations they don't like as discussed in class. There are also differing attitudes towards authority that are different from the States, with an idea of hierarchy being prevalent throughout Japan. All these differences, in my opinion, are reflective of the conformist culture that is dominant in Japan. Before the 15 year war, most of civil society was destroyed by Japan and within the last few decades, Japan has been ruled by one political party. It has only been through developments over the last few decades, such the 1995 Hanshin Earthquake and the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami where civil society has really been seen serving the people and playing a major role in Japanese society.
While civil society is weaker in Japan than it is in the US, it is very much a present force in the Japanese public. While everyone was going about to different places on the available free days, I stayed behind in Kyoto and ended up running into a blood donation trailer for the Japanese Red Cross just by Kyoto Station. It was a positive reminder for myself that civil society is present in Japan and supports the fact that it is growing. Throughout my travels in Japan, I have seen posters advocating things such as Fair Trade and blood donations. While Japanese society is conformist and civil society not as prevalent as back in the states, it has done nothing but pay dividends to the Japanese people. Even though making an organization incorporated costs 3 million yen and non- recognized organizations struggle to stay running, Japanese civil society continues to grow and to witness the fruit as a result of this growth has concluded my trip to Japan on a high note.
Sunday, July 28, 2013
Sunday, July 21, 2013
The Third Blog Post
The class trips to the Ritsumeikan
Peace Museum ,
Yasukuni Shrine and Yushukan Museum , and the Hiroshima Museum
of the Atomic Bomb have met all my expectations of what each visit would be
like. Based from what I have read and heard about each museum prior to
departure to Japan, the differences between the three museums are readily
apparent and it is possible to contrast each museum with background information
alone. It is clear that the Ritsumeikan
Peace Museum
holds a very liberal stance in contrast to the Yushukan Museum .
The Ritsumeikan Peace Museum
extensively covers Japanese aggression, mentions comfort women, and strives to
promote peace. On the other hand, the Yushukan glorifies Japan 's past
military campaigns and serves as an example of Japanese revisionist
historiography. The Museum of the Atomic Bomb, as its name implies, devotes its
attention to dropping of the Atomic bomb on Hiroshima and the grave consequences it had
on innocent civilians after the fact. While I can draw comparisons between
these museums just from readings alone, these visits in my opinion were worth
every bit of Yen that each ticket sold for. The excursions to these museums
have allowed to me experience these museums first hand, to make the comparisons
between each one, and to contrast them to museums back in the United States .
I must say
that my visit to the Ritsumeikan Peace Museum
was my first visit to a Peace
Museum of any sort. Viewing
the multiple exhibitions of artwork, banners, and other artifacts had really
made the museum as enjoyable as it was. The replica Japanese 1940's house
allowed me to reflect what life during the era was like, serving as somewhat of
a time capsule for the class. From what I saw, I felt that little necessary
information was held back as the museum serves as a demonstration and tribute
to the renouncement of war and the promotion of peace. One exhibit I found
enjoyable was the display of textbooks from different countries, which
attributes to the idea of collective memory and how ideas are transmitted,
discussed later that day in class. In terms of minimizing bias and having a
complete view of Japanese aggression during WWII, I felt that this museum was
going to be as good as it gets compared to the other museums to be visited, considering
the fact the museum covers the 15 year war extensively, depicts the negative
aspects of Japanese nationalism towards the occupied territories, and mentions
comfort women and chemical warfare, things I figured that I would not see in
the Yushukan and Atomic Bomb museums. Most museums I have seen in America don't
talk about atrocities that US soldiers have committed towards innocent
civilians nor talk about peace in general. So upon my exit from the Peace Museum ,
I reflected on how Americans would react if they went to a peace museum and if
there were more these respective types of museums in the states. While I could
think of several possible reactions, the question still pops up in my head
occasionally.
In contrast
to the Peace Museum ,
the class visit to Yasukuni Shrine and Yushukan Museum
u-turns away from what we have seen at Ritsumeikan. The large torii gates of
Yasukuni gave an overwhelming feeling as I first walked onto the premises.
However the area was lined with multiple food vendors as a festival was going
on. While the festivities were going on, I soon discovered how nationalist the
place really was. After the first gate, I witnessed an elderly man worshipping
a statue, going far as even taking off his suit jacket and tie in the process. I
had never seen anyone whole-heartedly worship anything that was not even a
deity or a religious figure. The worshipping I saw by Yasukuni itself only
reinforced my uneasy feeling obtained earlier from watching the man worship.
Upon my
initial steps into Yushukan, I immediately had gotten the feeling that the
museum glorified Japan 's
war history without really relaying much of the failures and consequences of
the campaigns. Knowing a little bit of Japanese history prior to the invasion
of Manchuria , I had already noticed that some
important facts and events were omitted or barely touched upon. It is also
noteworthy to point out the fact the museum holds tribute to Japan 's victory
over the Russians in the Russo-Japanese War. My classmates and I were not
really pleased at what we saw. Phrases such as "Chinese aggression"
and "the Korea
problem" really had some of my classmates' hearts pounding. As expected,
there was no mention of the atrocities that the Japanese had committed. The
fact that the museum recognized Manchukuo
as a legitimate, not puppet state, really went against what I had read in the
past. Fast forward further into the museum, I took note of the fact the Pearl Harbor was vaguely mentioned at all. The museum
only stated that the Japanese had launched a bombing campaign in Hawaii and other parts
of the Pacific, starting on December 8, 1941. In fact the only time I saw the
words "Pearl Harbor " was in a
description card for a model of a Japanese cruiser. The exhibits within the museum serve as a
clear model of revisionist historiography. Quite a few things observed in the
Yushukan went against things that some of us may have learned inside or outside
of the classroom in the past and it is understandable that a number of us were
angry and had a right to be.
While most
of the visit to the Yushukan invoked anger amongst the classmates, the only
"positive" aspect I got from the visit was reading the letters from
young soldiers and nurses to their parents and siblings. These letters, no
matter the country, serve as a painful reminder of the hardships and
overwhelming tragedies that war presents. As I read on, I couldn't help but
raise a few questions. With the younger generation coming and older generation
waning out, will less people visit the shrine and museum and how will it be
viewed in the future? Will future Prime Minister visits still cause stirs with China and South Korea ? Will the younger
generation overlook the significance of the museum? The visit to Yasukuni and
the Yushukan has only increased the number of questions.
While the Ritsumeikan Peace
Museum and the Yushukan
Museum offer differentiating views on
many of the same moments in history, the Hiroshima Atomic
Bomb Museum
somewhat provides as a middle ground for the two other museums. Visiting Hiroshima was very different compared to Ritsumeikan and
Yasukuni because of the fact that Hiroshima
is very much a graveyard to those who had passed when the bomb had dropped.
Because of this viewpoint, walking through the city, visiting the Peace Park ,
staring at where exactly the bomb landed, and viewing survivors pay tribute to
their lost friends and family was extremely surreal. With every pace I took, I
could not help but imagine how Hiroshima
looked like right after the atomic bomb was dropped.
The Atomic
Bomb Museum offers a deep insight towards the destruction the atomic bomb had
caused and suffering that the people had gone through. The exhibits presented
offer a testament to the destruction that atomic weapons cause and that no
other person should ever witness the kind of suffering the citizens of Hiroshima went through.
However at the same time, I felt the museum also tells an excellent story of
resilience and hope since it also covers the rebuilding of Hiroshima after the destruction. The whole visit
was one I would never forget.
While the
museum covers a great deal of the damage sustained by Hiroshima and its people, a few things are
not told. Like the Yushukan, I did not see anything that mentioned Japanese
aggression during WWII. However since the Atomic Bomb
Museum 's purpose is to
discuss matters related to its subject, I did not really expect to see this
aspect. Also I did not see any mention of the 10 Americans that were held
captive at Hiroshima
at the time the bomb was dropped, those same prisoners being killed by the
bomb. So even though the visit to the Hiroshima Atomic
Bomb Museum
was a memorable one, it is not without some missing puzzle pieces.
Overall
these three museums have allowed me to look Japan 's storytelling in many ways.
I have been presented with a liberal, nationalist, and victims' point of view
and with these visits complete, I have the rest of the trip to continue
reflecting on each one. Until the end of the trip, I will just continue to be
surprised in my travels as I was at the beginning of my stay here in Japan .
Thursday, July 11, 2013
The Second Blog Post: The Surprises up to Now
I arrived in Japan on the 8th and so far I have enjoyed my brief stay here in Kyoto. When applying for this program, I had signed up with the intent of being surprised by visiting a country that is very different from mine. So I am delighted to say that ever since I have set foot on Japanese soil, I have been nothing but surprised! Everything from the plethora of vending machines seamlessly located in every block to the washrooms has really opened my eyes in one way or another. It is also notable to mention that it is also very hot here with highs of 90 plus degrees and lows of 75 have really taken the wind out of myself and my fellow classmates as we walked along the backdrop of Kyoto. So the heat has been a surprise, albeit not a pleasant one. But not even the heat can stop the class from enjoying visiting friends at Ritsumeikan, enjoying the Golden Pavilion, and meditating at the Zen garden within Ryoan-Ji! Within the short period of time, the class has seen so much and has been met with nothing but surprises.
However while these several aspects of the visit have surprised us, there is one surprise that really stuck out compared to the rest. That one surprise was finding out from Professor Nakatsuji's lecture that the United States had censored information on Hiroshima and Nagasaki after the atomic bombs were initially dropped. Additionally, it is also surprising to find out that the US, after the dropping of the bombs, had censored the story of 47 samurai in Japan since it was a story about revenge. I was not aware of these facts and it is because these new things learned that makes me even more happier to be in Japan.
The class is only three days in and already we have learned quite a bit from our brief stay. It wont be long until everyone is fully adjusted somewhat to the climate, culture and the time difference. Much more is to come, especially with Osaka and Tokyo coming up soon!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)